Pal Pools, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pal Pools, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp.

56 A.D.2d 647, 391 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 647 (Pal Pools, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pal Pools, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp., 56 A.D.2d 647, 391 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of warranty, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 13, 1976, as permitted plaintiffs to discover and inspect certain material and denied its cross motion for a protective order. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The discovery and inspection shall proceed at the place designated in the order under review, at a time to be fixed by plaintiffs in a written notice of not less than 10 days, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. The "notice to discover and inspect” complies with CPLR 3120 and an examination before trial is unnecessary to identify the material requested. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Titone, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of warranty, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 13, 1976, as permitted plaintiffs to discover and inspect certain material and denied its cross motion for a protective order. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The discovery and inspection shall proceed at the place designated in the order under review, at a time to be fixed by plaintiffs in a written notice of not less than 10 days, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. The "notice to discover and inspect” complies with CPLR 3120 and an examination before trial is unnecessary to identify the material requested. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Titone, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 647, 391 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pal-pools-inc-v-union-carbide-corp-nyappdiv-1977.