Pal-Mar Water Control District v. Martin County

523 So. 2d 602, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10447, 1987 WL 718
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 1987·No. No. 4-86-0783·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We find no abuse of discretion. However, appellant may seek future permit approval upon additional good faith efforts to comply with and satisfy county requirements, subject to review in accordance with the process described in Pal-Mar [603]*603Water Management District v. Martin County, 377 So.2d 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), and Orange County v. City of Apopka, 299 So.2d 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., and BLOOM, PHILIP, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pal-Mar Water Control District v. Martin County, 523 So. 2d 602, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10447, 1987 WL 718 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

523 So. 2d 602 (Pal-Mar Water Control District v. Martin County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pal-Mar Water Management Dist. v. MARTIN CTY.
377 So. 2d 752 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Orange County v. City of Apopka
299 So. 2d 652 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)