Pakulski v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
168 A.D. 936, 153 N.Y.S. 1131
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1915
StatusPublished
This text of 168 A.D. 936 (Pakulski v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pakulski v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 168 A.D. 936, 153 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff was himself negligent as matter of law,' since there was no emergency, invitation or urgent motive, to excuse his attempt to board defendant’s moving train.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
168 A.D. 936, 153 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pakulski-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1915.