Pakuja Vang v. Valdese Weaver

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2026·No. 25-2240·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-2240

PAKUJA CRYSTAL VANG Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VALDESE WEAVER; USA GOVERNMENT; SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:25-cv-00330-MR-WCM)

Submitted: March 17, 2026 Decided: April 23, 2026

Before WYNN, HARRIS, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pakuja Crystal Vang, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pakuja Crystal Vang appeals the district court’s order dismissing her pro se civil action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. See Nagy v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 252, 254-55 (4th Cir. 2004) (explaining standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Vang v. Valdese Weaver, No. 1:25-cv-00330-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pakuja Vang v. Valdese Weaver, (4th Cir. 2026).

Pakuja Vang v. Valdese Weaver (Pakuja Vang v. Valdese Weaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paul Nagy v. Fmc Butner
376 F.3d 252 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)