Pakfood Public Co. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Pakfood Public Co. v. United States

239 F. Supp. 3d 1383, 2017 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 58

United States Court of International Trade·Decided May 10, 2017·No. Slip Op. 17-56; Court No. 14-00230·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

Judge Leo M. Gordon

Before the court is the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Final Results of Re-determination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Results”), ECF No. 56, in this action. There being no challenge to the Remand Results, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained; and it is further

ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see ECF No. 10 (order granting consent motion for preliminary injunction), must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

Judge Leo M. Gordon

Before the court is the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Final Results of Re-determination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Results”), ECF No. 56, in this action. There being no challenge to the Remand Results, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained; and it is further

ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see ECF No. 10 (order granting consent motion for preliminary injunction), must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012).

Pakfood Public Co. v. United States, 239 F. Supp. 3d 1383, 2017 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 58 (cit 2017).

Pincite

239 F. Supp. 3d 1383 (Pakfood Public Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related