P.A.K. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

P.A.K. v. State

582 So. 2d 132, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6843, 1991 WL 118228

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 3, 1991

DocketNo. 89-02234

StatusPublished

This text of 582 So. 2d 132 (P.A.K. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

P.A.K. v. State, 582 So. 2d 132, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6843, 1991 WL 118228 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the adjudication of delinquency of defendant, a juvenile, based upon a finding that she committed criminal mischief involving damage to a coke machine. The evidence was that three persons, including defendant, were present when a coke machine fell over. One of them said, “Let’s get money out.” Thereafter, the defendant and another girl were seen running away. We conclude that the state’s evidence against defendant was insufficient. The evidence did not establish why the machine fell over; if it was pushed, by whom; or that it was damaged.

Reversed. Defendant shall be discharged.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the adjudication of delinquency of defendant, a juvenile, based upon a finding that she committed criminal mischief involving damage to a coke machine. The evidence was that three persons, including defendant, were present when a coke machine fell over. One of them said, “Let’s get money out.” Thereafter, the defendant and another girl were seen running away. We conclude that the state’s evidence against defendant was insufficient. The evidence did not establish why the machine fell over; if it was pushed, by whom; or that it was damaged.

Reversed. Defendant shall be discharged.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

582 So. 2d 132, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6843, 1991 WL 118228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pak-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.