Paizes v. State of Florida
This text of Paizes v. State of Florida (Paizes v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
SPIROS C. PAIZES,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
No. 2D2025-2996
April 17, 2026
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit for Hillsborough County; sitting in its appellate capacity.
Spiros C. Paizes, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Denied.
KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
__________________________
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paizes v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paizes-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.