Paizes v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 17, 2026
Docket2D2025-2996
StatusPublished

This text of Paizes v. State of Florida (Paizes v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paizes v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

SPIROS C. PAIZES,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

No. 2D2025-2996

April 17, 2026

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit for Hillsborough County; sitting in its appellate capacity.

Spiros C. Paizes, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

__________________________

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Paizes v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paizes-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.