Paiz-Nunez v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Paiz-Nunez v. United States

191 F.2d 146, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2533

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 25, 1951

Docket12855

StatusPublished

This text of 191 F.2d 146 (Paiz-Nunez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paiz-Nunez v. United States, 191 F.2d 146, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2533 (9th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Juan Bautista Paiz-Nunez, was indicted in three counts, each charging a violation of 8 U.S.C.A. § 144. He had a jury trial and was found guilty on each count. From a judgment sentencing him on counts 1 and 2 to pay fines aggregating $200" and to be imprisoned for 60 days and suspending imposition of sentence on count 3 for three years he has appealed. The only question presented is whether the evidence warranted the verdict. It did. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Juan Bautista Paiz-Nunez, was indicted in three counts, each charging a violation of 8 U.S.C.A. § 144. He had a jury trial and was found guilty on each count. From a judgment sentencing him on counts 1 and 2 to pay fines aggregating $200" and to be imprisoned for 60 days and suspending imposition of sentence on count 3 for three years he has appealed. The only question presented is whether the evidence warranted the verdict. It did. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 F.2d 146, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paiz-nunez-v-united-states-ca9-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack