Pait v. Gutierrez

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided January 11, 2024·No. 4:23-cv-00141·Unknown

Opinion

William Pait, No. CV-23-00141-TUC-JAS

Petitioner, ORDER

v.

Mark Gutierrez,

Respondent. Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Macdonald that recommends denying Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this case with prejudice. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). /// /// /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) is accepted and adopted. (2) The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied. (3) This case is dismissed with prejudice. Dated this 10th day of January, 2024. A ark, Honorable James A. Soto United States District Judge

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pait v. Gutierrez, (D. Ariz. 2024).

Pait v. Gutierrez (Pait v. Gutierrez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conley v. Crabtree
14 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (D. Oregon, 1998)
Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp.
170 F.3d 734 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)