Painters' District Council No. 22, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers v. Austin

348 U.S. 979, 99 L. Ed. 762, 75 S. Ct. 571, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1487, 35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2709
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 4, 1955
DocketNo. 577
StatusPublished

This text of 348 U.S. 979 (Painters' District Council No. 22, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Painters' District Council No. 22, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers v. Austin, 348 U.S. 979, 99 L. Ed. 762, 75 S. Ct. 571, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1487, 35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2709 (1955).

Opinion

Appeal from

the Supreme Court of Michigan.

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by 28 U. S. C. § 2103, certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State courts; certiorari
28 U.S.C. § 1257(2)
§ 2103
28 U.S.C. § 2103

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 U.S. 979, 99 L. Ed. 762, 75 S. Ct. 571, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1487, 35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/painters-district-council-no-22-brotherhood-of-painters-decorators-scotus-1955.