Painter v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Painter v. Wilson

47 A. 349, 197 Pa. 434, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 758

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 31, 1900·No. Appeal, No. 109·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In this case the plaintiff moved for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, and a rule to show cause was granted. The motion for judgment was argued on December 21, 1899, and the rule to show cause was discharged. The learned court below in a clear and comprehensive opinion showed that the affidavit was sufficient to prevent judgment. In this conclusion we all concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In this case the plaintiff moved for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, and a rule to show cause was granted. The motion for judgment was argued on December 21, 1899, and the rule to show cause was discharged. The learned court below in a clear and comprehensive opinion showed that the affidavit was sufficient to prevent judgment. In this conclusion we all concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Painter v. Wilson, 47 A. 349, 197 Pa. 434, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 758 (Pa. 1900).

Pincite

47 A. 349 (Painter v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related