Painter v. Painter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Painter v. Painter

190 A.2d 149, 410 Pa. 382, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 624

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 16, 1963·No. Appeal, No. 63·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff brought an action in ejectment. The lower Court entered an Order overruling plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Order appealed from is interlocutory and unappealable. Nosal v. Nosal, 410 Pa. 304, 189 A. 2d 262; Sagot v. International Mailers Union, 409 Pa. 387, 187 A. 2d 284; Reading Co. v. Willow Development Company, 407 Pa. 469, 181 A. 2d 288.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff brought an action in ejectment. The lower Court entered an Order overruling plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Order appealed from is interlocutory and unappealable. Nosal v. Nosal, 410 Pa. 304, 189 A. 2d 262; Sagot v. International Mailers Union, 409 Pa. 387, 187 A. 2d 284; Reading Co. v. Willow Development Company, 407 Pa. 469, 181 A. 2d 288.

Appeal quashed.

Painter v. Painter, 190 A.2d 149, 410 Pa. 382, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 624 (Pa. 1963).

Pincite

190 A.2d 149 (Painter v. Painter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related