Painter v. Painter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Painter v. Painter

190 A.2d 149, 410 Pa. 382, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 624

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 16, 1963

DocketAppeal, No. 63

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 A.2d 149 (Painter v. Painter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Painter v. Painter, 190 A.2d 149, 410 Pa. 382, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 624 (Pa. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff brought an action in ejectment. The lower Court entered an Order overruling plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Order appealed from is interlocutory and unappealable. Nosal v. Nosal, 410 Pa. 304, 189 A. 2d 262; Sagot v. International Mailers Union, 409 Pa. 387, 187 A. 2d 284; Reading Co. v. Willow Development Company, 407 Pa. 469, 181 A. 2d 288.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff brought an action in ejectment. The lower Court entered an Order overruling plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Order appealed from is interlocutory and unappealable. Nosal v. Nosal, 410 Pa. 304, 189 A. 2d 262; Sagot v. International Mailers Union, 409 Pa. 387, 187 A. 2d 284; Reading Co. v. Willow Development Company, 407 Pa. 469, 181 A. 2d 288.

Appeal quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.2d 149, 410 Pa. 382, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/painter-v-painter-pa-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack