Painter v. Ohio
301 U.S. 667, 57 S. Ct. 932
This text of 301 U.S. 667 (Painter v. Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Painter v. Ohio, 301 U.S. 667, 57 S. Ct. 932 (1937).
Opinion
The motion of the appellee for leave to file a statement against jurisdiction is granted. The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 315; Westfall v. United States, 274 U. S. 256.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hebert v. Louisiana
272 U.S. 312 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Westfall v. United States
274 U.S. 256 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
301 U.S. 667, 57 S. Ct. 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/painter-v-ohio-scotus-1937.