Painter v. Durham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Painter v. Durham

195 Ill. App. 468

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 8, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,964

StatusPublished

This text of 195 Ill. App. 468 (Painter v. Durham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Painter v. Durham, 195 Ill. App. 468 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error, § 1802*—when judgment reversed without remanding. Where a judgment must be reversed as being entered on a wrong theory of the law, and the amount due plaintiff appears with certainty from the record, judgment will be entered in the Appellate Court for the amount which plaintiff is entitled to recover, and the cause will not be remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error, § 1802*—when judgment reversed without remanding. Where a judgment must be reversed as being entered on a wrong theory of the law, and the amount due plaintiff appears with certainty from the record, judgment will be entered in the Appellate Court for the amount which plaintiff is entitled to recover, and the cause will not be remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 Ill. App. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/painter-v-durham-illappct-1915.