Painter, Terry v. Hollingshead Development, LLC

CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJune 8, 2026
Docket2025-10-7199
StatusPublished

This text of Painter, Terry v. Hollingshead Development, LLC (Painter, Terry v. Hollingshead Development, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Painter, Terry v. Hollingshead Development, LLC, (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

FILED Jun 08, 2026 01:21 PM(ET) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT CHATTANOOGA

Terry Painter, Docket No. 2025-10-7199 Employee, v. Hollingshead Development, LLC, State File No. 55082-2024 Employer, And LM Insurance Corporation, Judge Audrey Headrick Carrier.

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER (Decision on the Record)

Mr. Painter requested an order requiring Hollingshead to authorize Dr. Mark Freeman to evaluate his hip and pay additional temporary disability benefits from May 2025 forward. Hollingshead countered that it recently offered a panel of hip specialists, from which Mr. Painter declined to make a selection. It also disputed Mr. Painter’s entitlement to additional temporary disability benefits. For the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. Painter is not entitled to the requested benefits.

Claim History

On August 6, 2024, Mr. Painter sustained several injuries, including a right- hip fracture, when he fell from a cement tanker truck and landed on a concrete pad. He received emergency surgery involving hardware placement from Dr. Michael Yee and underwent several months of physical therapy.

By February 2025, Dr. Yee believed Mr. Painter’s bones had healed, enabling him to handle the demands of his job. Dr. Yee did not assign restrictions but recommended that Mr. Painter “continue to remain weight bearing as tolerated on the right lower and right upper extremities.” He also recommended that Mr. Painter “get an impairment rating.”

1 By May 2025, Dr. Yee repeated that Mr. Painter had no restrictions but recommended that he remain “weight bearing as tolerated and lifting as tolerated.” Dr. Yee noted that Mr. Painter walked without an assistive device and discharged him to follow up as needed.

Hollingshead paid Mr. Painter temporary disability benefits from August 7, 2024, to May 19, 2025.

In July 2025, Mr. Painter obtained an independent medical evaluation with orthopedist Dr. Case Sanders. After examining Mr. Painter, Dr. Sanders placed him at maximum medical improvement and assigned an impairment rating.

In October 2025, Mr. Painter returned to Dr. Yee complaining of ongoing groin and hip pain. Mr. Painter reported he was full-weight bearing while walking. However, he used a cane “largely because of balance issues related to tinnitus.” Dr. Yee ordered a hip CT scan and did not assign restrictions.

In December 2025, Dr. Yee referred Mr. Painter to an orthopedic hip specialist. Within the referral note, Dr. Yee referenced Mr. Painter’s right-hip fracture and right-hip arthritis. Dr. Yee’s addendum explained that the likelihood of arthritis was “increased due to this type of fracture related to the original workers’ compensation injury.” Hollingshead did not offer Mr. Painter a panel.

In March 2026, Dr. Yee responded to a causation questionnaire about the referral. He stated Mr. Painter experienced immediate right-hip pain due to a fracture. Dr. Yee said the fracture healed appropriately; however, the CT scan showed “some avascular necrosis of the femoral head with mild resultant arthritis, related to the proximal femur fracture.” He also stated that severe displacement of a hip fracture can disrupt the blood flow, resulting in avascular necrosis. Dr. Yee placed Mr. Painter at maximum medical improvement for all his injuries, including avascular necrosis, and did not assign restrictions.

Hollingshead then authorized Mr. Painter to return to see hip surgeon Dr. Sanders, who performed his independent medical evaluation. Mr. Painter rejected the offer. In April, Hollingshead offered a panel, from which Mr. Painter selected Dr. Jason Rogers. However, Dr. Rogers ultimately declined to see him after reviewing his records. Hollingshead offered a revised panel that included Dr. Sanders, but Mr. Painter did not make a selection.

Mr. Painter asked the Court to order Hollingshead to authorize him to see Dr. 2 Freeman instead of selecting a hip specialist from a panel. He also asked the Court to order temporary disability benefits from May 2025 forward.

Hollingshead argued it offered Mr. Painter a panel, but he did not choose a physician. Despite offering a panel, Hollingshead also questioned causation of Mr. Painter’s current hip condition. It argued that he is not entitled to additional temporary disability benefits because Dr. Michael Yee released Mr. Painter without restrictions. Hollingshead also argued Mr. Painter’s own physician later placed him at maximum medical improvement in July 2025.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Painter must prove a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits that he is entitled to the requested benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

The first issue is the referral that Dr. Yee made to an orthopedic hip specialist in December 2025. Months later, Dr. Yee’s questionnaire responses showed that Mr. Painter experienced immediate right-hip pain due to a fracture. Hollingshead eventually offered Mr. Painter a panel in April 2026, but Dr. Rogers declined to see him. Hollingshead offered a revised panel, but Mr. Painter did not select a doctor. Instead, he asked the Court to order Hollingshead to authorize him to see Dr. Freeman.

When the treating physician refers an employee to a specialist, the employer must either accept a designated physician or provide a panel of specialists within three business days. Id. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(ii). Since Dr. Yee made no specific referral, Hollingshead offered a panel. Mr. Painter’s selected doctor chose not to accept him as a patient after reviewing his medical records. Therefore, the Court finds Mr. Painter is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits of entitlement to having Dr. Freeman designated as the authorized treating physician.

While Hollingshead offered a panel, it did so months after the referral. The record specified that the reason for Dr. Yee’s referral was for Mr. Painter’s right-hip fracture and resulting arthritis. Without any supporting medical proof, Hollingshead delayed offering a panel because it wanted clarification of whether the referral was related to the work injury. Parties and their lawyers are poorly positioned to formulate expert medical opinions. Lurz v. Int’l Paper Co., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 8, at *17 (Feb. 14, 2018). The Court refers this case to the 3 Compliance Program for penalty assessments based on Hollingshead’s failure to timely offer a panel of orthopedic hip specialists. Id. § 50-6-118(a)(8)-(9).

The second issue is whether Mr. Painter is entitled to additional temporary disability benefits. He is not because Dr. Yee did not take him off work. See Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015) (injured worker is eligible for temporary disability benefits if the worker became disabled from working due to a compensable injury, a causal connection exists between the injury and the inability to work, and the worker established the duration of the period of disability).

For temporary partial disability benefits, Mr. Painter must show that Dr. Yee returned him to work with restrictions that Hollingshead could not or would not accommodate. Id. at *7-8. Entitlement to temporary disability benefits end when an employee reaches maximum medical improvement. Id. § 50-6-207(2)(A).

Mr. Painter sought temporary disability benefits from May 2025 forward. In February 2025, Dr. Yee released Mr. Painter to “weight bearing as tolerated” and did not assign restrictions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Painter, Terry v. Hollingshead Development, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/painter-terry-v-hollingshead-development-llc-tennworkcompcl-2026.