Paino v. State
435 S.E.2d 24, 263 Ga. 331
This text of 435 S.E.2d 24 (Paino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Paino v. State, 435 S.E.2d 24, 263 Ga. 331 (Ga. 1993).
Opinion
Michael J. Paino has petitioned this court to appoint counsel to represent him in the filing of a petition for certiorari. There is no constitutional right to representation of counsel on certiorari. The constitutional right extends only through the prosecution of a direct appeal. Therefore, Paino’s motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pierce v. State
717 S.E.2d 202 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2011)
Orr v. State
575 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Williams v. Zant
558 S.E.2d 3 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2001)
Burroughs v. State
521 S.E.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Fullwood v. Sivley
517 S.E.2d 511 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
435 S.E.2d 24, 263 Ga. 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paino-v-state-ga-1993.