Paino v. State
435 S.E.2d 24, 263 Ga. 331
Opinion
Michael J. Paino has petitioned this court to appoint counsel to represent him in the filing of a petition for certiorari. There is no constitutional right to representation of counsel on certiorari. The constitutional right extends only through the prosecution of a direct appeal. Therefore, Paino’s motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paino v. State, 435 S.E.2d 24, 263 Ga. 331 (Ga. 1993).
435 S.E.2d 24 (Paino v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pierce v. State
717 S.E.2d 202 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2011)
Orr v. State
575 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Williams v. Zant
558 S.E.2d 3 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2001)
Burroughs v. State
521 S.E.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Fullwood v. Sivley
517 S.E.2d 511 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)