Paino Bros. v. Central National Bank of Yonkers
This text of 242 A.D. 845 (Paino Bros. v. Central National Bank of Yonkers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment dismissing complaint in an action to recover the amount of an uncertified check paid by defendant after-having received a notice to stop payment thereon, and for damages resulting therefrom, reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant upon the ground that, because defendant knew that the money represented by the check in question belonged to the payee and had entered the amount thereof on his pass book, it could not stop payment without incurring liability to the payee. The defendant was not at liberty, as against plaintiff, to determine any such question. The only [846]*846question in this case is whether the defendant waived the regulation contained in the pass book in question and the provisions of section 350-b of the Negotiable Instruments Law concerning the provisional character of the deposit. The record on this appeal discloses no evidence of such waiver. The check was not paid to the payee in cash, nor certified, nor credited to the payee on the defendant’s books at the time the stop order was given. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paino-bros-v-central-national-bank-of-yonkers-nyappdiv-1934.