Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Bennett

469 So. 2d 881, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1202, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14066
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 1985
DocketNo. 85-18
StatusPublished

This text of 469 So. 2d 881 (Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Bennett, 469 So. 2d 881, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1202, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14066 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

JORGENSON, Judge.

We say, “No, thank you” to appellant Paine, Webber’s invitation to review a trial court order denying a motion to compel arbitration, see § 682.20(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983), upon a holding that this court will not issue advisory opinions.

The complaint filed in this action was dismissed with leave to amend at the urging of Paine, Webber. The order which we are invited to review is based upon that complaint. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to the appellant to file anew in the event an amended complaint is properly filed and the trial court issues a similar order.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
469 So. 2d 881, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1202, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paine-webber-jackson-curtis-inc-v-bennett-fladistctapp-1985.