Paine v. Water Works Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Paine v. Water Works Supply Co.

243 N.W.2d 156, 309 Minn. 549, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1580

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 11, 1976

DocketNo. 46106

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 243 N.W.2d 156 (Paine v. Water Works Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paine v. Water Works Supply Co., 243 N.W.2d 156, 309 Minn. 549, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1580 (Mich. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Employer and insurer seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding dependency benefits to claimant, surviving spouse of the decedent employee. The issue on appeal is whether decedent’s death arose out of his employment.

Decedent died of injuries sustained in an automobile accident on February 7, 1974, while driving home in a car provided for his use by the employer. Testimony adduced at the compensation hearing reasonably supports the board’s determination that off-the-premises travel was a substantial part of the services for which decedent was hired. Therefore, under our decisions decedent was protected by the coverage of the Workers’ Compensation Act while within his usual territory including travel to his home. See, Williams v. Hoyt Const. Co. Inc. 306 Minn. 59, 237 N. W. 2d 339 (1975); Howlett v. Midwest Distributors, Inc. 202 Minn. 247, 277 N. W. 913 (1938). The compensation board’s finding that decedent was killed in an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment, and the implicit finding that he had not so departed from the employer’s business as to place himself beyond the coverage of the act, are supported by substantial evidence. The board’s award is affirmed. Williams v. Hoyt Const. Co. Inc. supra; Gumbrill v. [550]*550General Motors Corp. 216 Minn. 351, 13 N. W. 2d 16 (1944); Lunde v. Congoleum-Nairn, Inc. 211 Minn. 487, 1 N. W. 2d 606 (1942).

Respondent is allowed $350 attorneys fees on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Employer and insurer seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding dependency benefits to claimant, surviving spouse of the decedent employee. The issue on appeal is whether decedent’s death arose out of his employment.

Decedent died of injuries sustained in an automobile accident on February 7, 1974, while driving home in a car provided for his use by the employer. Testimony adduced at the compensation hearing reasonably supports the board’s determination that off-the-premises travel was a substantial part of the services for which decedent was hired. Therefore, under our decisions decedent was protected by the coverage of the Workers’ Compensation Act while within his usual territory including travel to his home. See, Williams v. Hoyt Const. Co. Inc. 306 Minn. 59, 237 N. W. 2d 339 (1975); Howlett v. Midwest Distributors, Inc. 202 Minn. 247, 277 N. W. 913 (1938). The compensation board’s finding that decedent was killed in an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment, and the implicit finding that he had not so departed from the employer’s business as to place himself beyond the coverage of the act, are supported by substantial evidence. The board’s award is affirmed. Williams v. Hoyt Const. Co. Inc. supra; Gumbrill v. [550]*550General Motors Corp. 216 Minn. 351, 13 N. W. 2d 16 (1944); Lunde v. Congoleum-Nairn, Inc. 211 Minn. 487, 1 N. W. 2d 606 (1942).

Respondent is allowed $350 attorneys fees on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 N.W.2d 156, 309 Minn. 549, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paine-v-water-works-supply-co-minn-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack