Paine v. Solinger
This text of 87 A.D.2d 607 (Paine v. Solinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to rescind a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), entered September 16, 1981, as denied their motion for summary judgment as against the plaintiff. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. There are triable issues of fact with respect to whether the alleged misrepresentations by the third-party defendant Coughlin were a material inducement to plaintiff’s execution of the contract (see Dress Shirt Sales v Hotel Martinique Assoc., 12 NY2d 339, 343; 24 NY Jur, Fraud and Deceit, § 163, at p 231; § 164). Weinstein, J. P., O’Connor, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 A.D.2d 607, 450 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paine-v-solinger-nyappdiv-1982.