Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway

59 N.H. 215

DecidedJune 5, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 59 N.H. 215 (Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway, 59 N.H. 215 (N.H. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

For some purposes, a review is a new action. Haven v. Libbey, Smith (N. H.) 109; Barker v. Barker, 39 N. H. 408, 409; Cahoon v. Coe, 57 N. H. 556, 599; Camp v. Hilliard, 58 N. H. 42; Page v. Brewster, 58 N. H. 126. But it is settled that the right of review in such cases as this is not affected by e. 64 of Laws of 1878. Rowell v. B. & M. R. R., ante, p. 35.

Motion granted.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

For some purposes, a review is a new action. Haven v. Libbey, Smith (N. H.) 109; Barker v. Barker, 39 N. H. 408, 409; Cahoon v. Coe, 57 N. H. 556, 599; Camp v. Hilliard, 58 N. H. 42; Page v. Brewster, 58 N. H. 126. But it is settled that the right of review in such cases as this is not affected by e. 64 of Laws of 1878. Rowell v. B. & M. R. R., ante, p. 35.

Motion granted.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 N.H. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paine-v-grand-trunk-railway-nh-1879.