Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway

59 N.H. 215

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1879·Published

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

For some purposes, a review is a new action. Haven v. Libbey, Smith (N. H.) 109; Barker v. Barker, 39 N. H. 408, 409; Cahoon v. Coe, 57 N. H. 556, 599; Camp v. Hilliard, 58 N. H. 42; Page v. Brewster, 58 N. H. 126. But it is settled that the right of review in such cases as this is not affected by e. 64 of Laws of 1878. Rowell v. B. & M. R. R., ante, p. 35.

Motion granted.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

For some purposes, a review is a new action. Haven v. Libbey, Smith (N. H.) 109; Barker v. Barker, 39 N. H. 408, 409; Cahoon v. Coe, 57 N. H. 556, 599; Camp v. Hilliard, 58 N. H. 42; Page v. Brewster, 58 N. H. 126. But it is settled that the right of review in such cases as this is not affected by e. 64 of Laws of 1878. Rowell v. B. & M. R. R., ante, p. 35.

Motion granted.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway, 59 N.H. 215 (N.H. 1879).

Pincite

59 N.H. 215 (Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.