Paine Lumber Co. v. Neal
This text of 214 F. 82 (Paine Lumber Co. v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We agree with Judge Mayer that, since it clearly appears — indeed, the .proposition is not disputed — that defendants’ acts were not malicious nor personally directed against the individual complainants, injunctive relief, which is all they pray for, cannot be granted in this suit. The bill was, therefore, properly dismissed. Any discussion of the other questions raised, viz., whether the particular agreements or combinations are obnoxious either to the common law or to-one or more of these statutes would be academic and need not now be entered into.
The decree is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 F. 82, 130 C.C.A. 522, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paine-lumber-co-v-neal-ca2-1914.