Paine Hardware Co. v. Lenox

128 S.E. 688, 34 Ga. App. 131, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 67
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 9, 1925·No. 16315·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

It was illegal to set aside a year’s support for the widow and minor child in this case, since the evidence showed that the child, at the time of the death of the father, was a married woman, and that her husband was an able-bodied man, able, to support her; and this is true although she was separated from her husband. There being no legal duty on the father to support his married daughter, and the year’s support for the widow and the minor child being illegally’ set aside, a new trial should have been granted. See Goss v. Harris, 117 Ga. 345 (43 S. E. 734).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorth, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paine Hardware Co. v. Lenox, 128 S.E. 688, 34 Ga. App. 131, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 67 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

128 S.E. 688 (Paine Hardware Co. v. Lenox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gentry v. Black
342 S.E.2d 729 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)