Paikoff v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Paikoff v. McGoldrick

280 A.D. 996, 117 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4531

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 1952·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review orders of the local rent office and the State Rent Administrator fixing the maximum rent of appellant’s apartment premises, appellant contended that the premises were not subject to rent control under the [997] State Residential Rent Law (L. 1946, eh. 274, § 2, subd. 2, par. [gj, as amd. by L. 1950, eh. 250, as amd.). The petition was dismissed at Special Term. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review orders of the local rent office and the State Rent Administrator fixing the maximum rent of appellant’s apartment premises, appellant contended that the premises were not subject to rent control under the [997] State Residential Rent Law (L. 1946, eh. 274, § 2, subd. 2, par. [gj, as amd. by L. 1950, eh. 250, as amd.). The petition was dismissed at Special Term. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ.

Paikoff v. McGoldrick, 280 A.D. 996, 117 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

280 A.D. 996 (Paikoff v. McGoldrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related