Paikoff v. McGoldrick
This text of 280 A.D. 996 (Paikoff v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review orders of the local rent office and the State Rent Administrator fixing the maximum rent of appellant’s apartment premises, appellant contended that the premises were not subject to rent control under the [997]*997State Residential Rent Law (L. 1946, eh. 274, § 2, subd. 2, par. [gj, as amd. by L. 1950, eh. 250, as amd.). The petition was dismissed at Special Term. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 A.D. 996, 117 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paikoff-v-mcgoldrick-nyappdiv-1952.