Paige v. Turner Hall Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Paige v. Turner Hall Corp.

103 A.D.2d 769, 477 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19385

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 103 A.D.2d 769 (Paige v. Turner Hall Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paige v. Turner Hall Corp., 103 A.D.2d 769, 477 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an oral employment contract, defendants appeal, as limited by their notices of appeal and brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Young, J.), dated June 15,1982, as denied their motion, for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action and (2) a further order of the same court, dated February 24, 1983, as, upon deeming their motion for renewal of the prior motion as one for reargument and granting reargument, adhered to its prior determination. H Appeal from the order dated June 15, 1982, dismissed as academic. Said order was superseded by the order granting reargument. H Order dated February 24, 1983, affirmed insofar as appealed from. 11 Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. 11 Although plaintiff’s affidavits in response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment seem to contradict statements she made at her deposition, our burden is issue finding and there does appear to be an issue of fact as to the termination terms under the alleged contract. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an oral employment contract, defendants appeal, as limited by their notices of appeal and brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Young, J.), dated June 15,1982, as denied their motion, for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action and (2) a further order of the same court, dated February 24, 1983, as, upon deeming their motion for renewal of the prior motion as one for reargument and granting reargument, adhered to its prior determination. H Appeal from the order dated June 15, 1982, dismissed as academic. Said order was superseded by the order granting reargument. H Order dated February 24, 1983, affirmed insofar as appealed from. 11 Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. 11 Although plaintiff’s affidavits in response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment seem to contradict statements she made at her deposition, our burden is issue finding and there does appear to be an issue of fact as to the termination terms under the alleged contract. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 A.D.2d 769, 477 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paige-v-turner-hall-corp-nyappdiv-1984.