Paige v. State
This text of 573 So. 2d 201 (Paige v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Paige challenges the departure sentence imposed after his entry of a nolo conten-dere plea to the charges of a lewd assault upon a child under 16, and use of a child in a sexual performance. The state cross appeals dismissal of two counts of sexual battery.
The reason for issuing a departure sentence was never reduced to writing, and in addition, the reason pronounced orally by the trial judge did not constitute a valid reason for departure. Wilson v. State, 567 So.2d 425 (Fla.1990). We, therefore, vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990). We also find that the trial judge did not err in dismissing the sexual battery counts, and affirm the decision challenged on cross appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
573 So. 2d 201, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 472, 1991 WL 7093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paige-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.