Paige v. Sessions

45 U.S. 122, 11 L. Ed. 903, 4 How. 122, 1846 U.S. LEXIS 387
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 16, 1846
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 45 U.S. 122 (Paige v. Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paige v. Sessions, 45 U.S. 122, 11 L. Ed. 903, 4 How. 122, 1846 U.S. LEXIS 387 (1846).

Opinion

Mr. Justice McLEAN

delivered the opinion of the court.

This writ of error brings before us a case from the Circuit Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

At May term, 1840, a judgment was obtained by the plaintiff against J. R. 'Brown, James Magee, and E. J. Sessions, for two thousand two hundred and sixty three dollars, on which judgment an execution was issued the 12th January, 1842, which was levied on a large amount of personal property, supposed, as stated in the return of the marshal, to belong to E. J. Sessions. A part of this property was claimed by Martha A. Sessions, the wife of E. J Sessions, as devisee of Russel Smith, deceased. A bond being given by the. claimant, and pleadings being filed, under the statute of Mississippi, the right of property was submitted to a jury, who found the title to it in the said Martha, and that it was not subject to the above execution ; on which verdict judgment was entered. On the trial, a bill of exceptions was filed by the plaintiff, in which was set out the record of the original judgment and execution, the .will of Russel Smith, and the probate of the .same, the inventory and appraisement of the property of the deceased, and other evidence. It is unnecéssary to state this evidence in detail, or to consider the legal questions which were raised in the case, as, on the same state of facts, the same legal questions were considered and decided at the last term of this court, in the case of Price v. Sessions, 3 Howard, 624. The rulings of the court in that case were sustained, and the judgment was affirmed ; and the judgment in this case is also affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drake v. Surget
36 Miss. 458 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1858)
Wiggins v. McGimpsey ex rel. Robertson
21 Miss. 532 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1850)
Doe v. Natchez Insurance
16 Miss. 197 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 1847)
McRaven v. McGuire
17 Miss. 34 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1847)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 U.S. 122, 11 L. Ed. 903, 4 How. 122, 1846 U.S. LEXIS 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paige-v-sessions-scotus-1846.