Paige v. Powers
215 A.D. 721
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1925·Published
Opinion
Where two brokers are employed, the one effects the sale who brings the minds of the parties to meet. (Hobbs v. Edgar, 23 Misc. 618, 620; Smith v. McGovern, 65 N. Y. 574.) There is no evidence that plaintiff accomplished this, but there is evidence that broker Goldstein did. The verdict of the jury is, therefore, against the weight of the evidence, and the judgment and order are reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paige v. Powers, 215 A.D. 721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
215 A.D. 721 (Paige v. Powers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. . McGovern
65 N.Y. 574 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Hobbs v. Edgar
23 Misc. 618 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)