Paige v. Palmleaf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Paige v. Palmleaf

232 A.D. 848

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 848 (Paige v. Palmleaf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paige v. Palmleaf, 232 A.D. 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence upon the question of whether the plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sale, and upon the further ground that the plaintiff failed to establish the usual and customary rate of brokerage upon the sale of real property in the city of New York. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper and Davis, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., concurs upon the last ground stated; Seudder, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence upon the question of whether the plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sale, and upon the further ground that the plaintiff failed to establish the usual and customary rate of brokerage upon the sale of real property in the city of New York. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper and Davis, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., concurs upon the last ground stated; Seudder, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paige-v-palmleaf-nyappdiv-1931.