Paige v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Paige v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

34 A.D.2d 568, 310 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5278

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 A.D.2d 568 (Paige v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paige v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp., 34 A.D.2d 568, 310 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to section 618 of the Insurance Law for leave to bring an action against appellant, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 7, 1969, which granted the application. Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for a hearing, in accordance with the views set forth below, and a new determination. The questions of fact have not been considered. We are of the opinion that triable issues of fact are presented on the questions of whether a hit and run accident occurred and whether notification was given to the Police Department within 24 hours. We express no opinion as to the merits of the issues raised by appellant. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins and Brennan, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to section 618 of the Insurance Law for leave to bring an action against appellant, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 7, 1969, which granted the application. Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for a hearing, in accordance with the views set forth below, and a new determination. The questions of fact have not been considered. We are of the opinion that triable issues of fact are presented on the questions of whether a hit and run accident occurred and whether notification was given to the Police Department within 24 hours. We express no opinion as to the merits of the issues raised by appellant. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins and Brennan, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 568, 310 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paige-v-motor-vehicle-accident-indemnification-corp-nyappdiv-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack