Paige-El v. Beck
This text of Paige-El v. Beck (Paige-El v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6680
ROBERT PAIGE-EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THEODIS BECK; G. J. HAYES; PAMELA ALSTON; BARRY J. ANDERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-38-5-H)
Submitted: August 5, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Paige-El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Robert Paige-El, a North Carolina inmate, filed a
complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), alleging prison
officials searched his locker and discarded his legal books and
papers and his religious books. Paige-El appeals from the district
court’s order dismissing his § 1983 action as frivolous under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2000). While we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court, see Paige-El v. Beck, No. CA-03-38-5-H (E.D.
N.C. March 25, 2003), we modify the district court’s order to
reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paige-El v. Beck, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paige-el-v-beck-ca4-2004.