Paige Co. of N. Cal. v. Superior Court

231 P. 344, 194 Cal. 795, 1924 Cal. LEXIS 275
California Supreme Court·Decided November 17, 1924·No. S. F. No. 11384.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[1] It appearing upon the face of the petition herein that the petitioner has heretofore applied for a similar writ of prohibition to the district court of appeal, in and for the third appellate district, and that its said application was, on the fourteenth day of November, 1924, denied by said court, the remedy of the petitioner herein was by application for a transfer and hearing in this court upon its aforesaid petition and was not by way of an original application to this court for the writ herein sought. Its said application is for that reason denied. *Page 797

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paige Co. of N. Cal. v. Superior Court, 231 P. 344, 194 Cal. 795, 1924 Cal. LEXIS 275 (Cal. 1924).

231 P. 344 (Paige Co. of N. Cal. v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hagan v. Superior Court
371 P.2d 982 (California Supreme Court, 1962)
McDonough v. Garrison
156 P.2d 983 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
Linstead v. Superior Court
60 P.2d 280 (California Supreme Court, 1936)