Paige A. Kester v. State Farm Lloyds
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00267-CV ___________________________
PAIGE A. KESTER, Appellant
V.
STATE FARM LLOYDS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 153rd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 153-329343-21
Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On August 9, 2022, we notified appellant that the trial-court clerk responsible
for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant has not arranged
to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P.
35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s record
and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 44.3.
Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record,
we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b),
43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: September 1, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paige A. Kester v. State Farm Lloyds (Paige A. Kester v. State Farm Lloyds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.