Page Woven Wire Fence Co. v. Brooks

104 S.W. 482, 126 Mo. App. 495, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 424
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 7, 1907·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Defendant appealed from a judgment against him in the circuit court and brought the case here on a transcript of the judgment and order of appeal. Aside from the recitals in what purports to be a bill of exceptions, the abstract of the record filed by appellant fails to show the verdict and judgment, filing and overruling of motion for new trial and filing of bill of exceptions.

It has been held over and over again that such matters cannot be proved by the recitals of the bill of exceptions, but must appear from the record. [Cummings v. Eiler, 121 Mo. App. 576; Redd v. Railway, 122 Mo. App. 93; Walner v. Wade, 101 S. W. 686, 124 Mo. App. 496; St. Charles ex rel. v. Deemar, 174 Mo. 122; Williams v. Harris, 110 Mo. App. 538; Kampf v. Transit Co., 102 Mo. App. 314; Hughes v. Henderson, 95 Mo. App. 312.]

None of the errors assigned is properly before us for review and, accordingly, the judgment must be affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Page Woven Wire Fence Co. v. Brooks, 104 S.W. 482, 126 Mo. App. 495, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 424 (Mo. Ct. App. 1907).

104 S.W. 482 (Page Woven Wire Fence Co. v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Walker
274 S.W. 56 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1925)
Midwest National Bank & Trust Co. v. Parker Corn Co.
245 S.W. 217 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1922)
Philips v. City of Webb
108 S.W. 593 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)