Page & Wirtz Construction Co. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers of America
This text of 444 F.2d 253 (Page & Wirtz Construction Co. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole issue in a trial to the Court below was the amount of damages, if any, due the appellees and cross appellants under 29 U.S.C. § 187(b) as the consequence of a secondary boycott [see our decision as to the boycott, International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers of America, Local Union 408, AFL-CIO v. N.L.R.B., No. 29,944, September 1, 1970].
After hearing the evidence the District Court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, fixing and awarding damages in some instances and denying recovery in others. The findings are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The judgment will be affirmed on both direct and cross appeals.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 F.2d 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/page-wirtz-construction-co-v-international-assn-of-bridge-structural-ca5-1971.