Page v. Valentine
This text of 518 So. 2d 393 (Page v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse and remand this cause to the trial court with directions to vacate the injunction which appears to limit the appellants’ lawyer from making contact with a material witness. The order was entered on a motion to disqualify the lawyer from representing the appellant Page because of the lawyer’s previous representation of the appellee town in another lawsuit. The order denies the motion to disqualify and both sides have appealed claiming a lack of evidentiary support for the trial court’s order. We find no error in the trial court’s denial of the motion to disqualify but find no evidentiary support for the order limiting the lawyer’s contact with the witness.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
518 So. 2d 393, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 109, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11794, 1987 WL 3347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/page-v-valentine-fladistctapp-1987.