Page v. Tao

295 S.E.2d 470, 306 N.C. 739, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1559
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 1982·No. No. 255A82·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts are fully and accurately stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. For the reasons given in that opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Page v. Tao, 295 S.E.2d 470, 306 N.C. 739, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1559 (N.C. 1982).

295 S.E.2d 470 (Page v. Tao) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murdock v. Ratliff
305 S.E.2d 48 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)