Page v. Sun Insurance Office

64 F. 194, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3037
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota·Decided November 5, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

NELSON, District Judge

(after stilting tlie facts). Under this clause in the Minnesota standard policy, which is the contract governing the case, the limitation of liability is for a proportionate part of the whole insurance covering the property; and the stipulation. exempts tlie defendant from any greater liability than a part of the loss, to be measured by the whole amount insured. This rule, it seems to me, must be applied whether the other insurance is by specific or compound policies. There is no intimation in the clause that compound or floating policies covering the same and other property sire not to be considered as part of tlie whole insurance covering such property. Let judgment be entered for plaintiffs in the sum of $1,5-19.10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Page v. Sun Insurance Office, 64 F. 194, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3037 (circtdmn 1894).

64 F. 194 (Page v. Sun Insurance Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Page v. Sun Insurance Office
74 F. 203 (Eighth Circuit, 1896)