Page v. State

282 S.W.3d 813, 373 Ark. 193, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 247, 2008 WL 963659
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 10, 2008
DocketCR 08-322
StatusPublished

This text of 282 S.W.3d 813 (Page v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Page v. State, 282 S.W.3d 813, 373 Ark. 193, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 247, 2008 WL 963659 (Ark. 2008).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Thomas B. Devine III, a full-time, state-salaried public defender for the Sixth Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant, Genre Page, an indigent defendant. Following a jury trial, Page was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life without parole. A notice of appeal was timely filed and a request for the transcribed record was filed in this case.

Mr. Devine now asks to be relieved as counsel for appellant in this criminal appeal based on the case of Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000) (holding that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal), and Tester v. State, 341 Ark. 281, 16 S.W.3d 227 (2000) (per curiam) (relieving appellant’s court-appointed public defender and appointing new counsel on appeal).

Since the time of those decisions, however, the law was changed by the General Assembly. Act 1370 of 2001 provided in part: “Persons employed as full-time public defenders who are not provided a state-funded secretary, may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Arkansas Supreme Court or the Arkansas Court of Appeals.” That provision is now codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604 (b)(2)(B) (Repl. 2007).

Mr. Devine’s motion states that he is provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary. Accordingly, we grant his motion to withdraw as attorney. Tim Cullen will be substituted as attorney for appellant in this matter. The clerk will establish a new briefing schedule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tester v. State
16 S.W.3d 227 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Rushing v. State
8 S.W.3d 489 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 S.W.3d 813, 373 Ark. 193, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 247, 2008 WL 963659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/page-v-state-ark-2008.