Page v. Page

25 Ohio C.C. Dec. 285
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 17, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Ohio C.C. Dec. 285 (Page v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Page v. Page, 25 Ohio C.C. Dec. 285 (Ohio Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A motion lias been made by tbe defendant to dismiss the appeal in this case. The case is one pending in this court solely for the purpose of procuring an allowance of alimony. 'Under the new constitution, Art. 4, Sec. 6, the case is not appealable and the motion to dismiss the appeal will be granted. See Deeds v. Snyder, 59 Bull. 481; 91 Ohio St. 000; Dewitt v. Dewitt, 67 Ohio St. 340 [66 N. E. Rep. 136] ; Price v. Price, 10 Ohio St. 316; Reed v. Reed, 17 Ohio St. 564.

A similar conclusion has been reached by the court of appeals in Franklin county in the unreported case of Dodd v. Dodd, decided February 2, 1915, and in eases in the court of-appeals in Cuyahoga county and in other appellate districts of the state.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lessee of Eggleston v. Bradford
10 Ohio St. 312 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1840)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Ohio C.C. Dec. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/page-v-page-ohioctapp-1915.