Page v. Page

25 Ohio C.C. Dec. 285
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 1915·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A motion lias been made by tbe defendant to dismiss the appeal in this case. The case is one pending in this court solely for the purpose of procuring an allowance of alimony. 'Under the new constitution, Art. 4, Sec. 6, the case is not appealable and the motion to dismiss the appeal will be granted. See Deeds v. Snyder, 59 Bull. 481; 91 Ohio St. 000; Dewitt v. Dewitt, 67 Ohio St. 340 [66 N. E. Rep. 136] ; Price v. Price, 10 Ohio St. 316; Reed v. Reed, 17 Ohio St. 564.

A similar conclusion has been reached by the court of appeals in Franklin county in the unreported case of Dodd v. Dodd, decided February 2, 1915, and in eases in the court of-appeals in Cuyahoga county and in other appellate districts of the state.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Page v. Page, 25 Ohio C.C. Dec. 285 (Ohio Ct. App. 1915).

25 Ohio C.C. Dec. 285 (Page v. Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lessee of Eggleston v. Bradford
10 Ohio St. 312 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1840)