Page v. Page

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Page v. Page

718 So. 2d 1288, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13436, 1998 WL 729685

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 21, 1998

DocketNo. 97-3593

StatusPublished

This text of 718 So. 2d 1288 (Page v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Page v. Page, 718 So. 2d 1288, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13436, 1998 WL 729685 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues with regard to the trial court’s order on appellant’s petition for modification of his alimony obligation. We affirm the trial court’s downward modification without further discussion. The parties agree, however, that a scrivener’s error regarding the date on which appellant’s modification petition was filed resulted in an erroneous calculation of the amount of the husband’s alimony arrearage. Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court to recalculate the arrearage using the correct date and considering the date of appellee’s remarriage during pendency of this appeal, which appel-lee admits terminated the support obligation.

ERVIN, MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues with regard to the trial court’s order on appellant’s petition for modification of his alimony obligation. We affirm the trial court’s downward modification without further discussion. The parties agree, however, that a scrivener’s error regarding the date on which appellant’s modification petition was filed resulted in an erroneous calculation of the amount of the husband’s alimony arrearage. Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court to recalculate the arrearage using the correct date and considering the date of appellee’s remarriage during pendency of this appeal, which appel-lee admits terminated the support obligation.

ERVIN, MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

718 So. 2d 1288, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13436, 1998 WL 729685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/page-v-page-fladistctapp-1998.