Page v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Page v. New York City Transit Authority

300 N.E.2d 735, 32 N.Y.2d 948, 347 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1166

DecidedJune 8, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 300 N.E.2d 735 (Page v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Page v. New York City Transit Authority, 300 N.E.2d 735, 32 N.Y.2d 948, 347 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1166 (N.Y. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment modified, without costs, by reinstating the Authority’s determination with respect to the charge that petitioner moved the train in reverse direction without proper authority and, as so modified, affirmed, and the matter remitted to Special Term with directions to remand to the Authority for reassessment of the sanction to be imposed. There was substantial evidence, albeit contradicted, to support the finding and so much of the determination holding that petitioner improperly moved a train against the direction of traffic without permission.

Concur: Judges Breitel, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Chief Judge Fuld and Judge Burke dissent and vote to affirm on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment modified, without costs, by reinstating the Authority’s determination with respect to the charge that petitioner moved the train in reverse direction without proper authority and, as so modified, affirmed, and the matter remitted to Special Term with directions to remand to the Authority for reassessment of the sanction to be imposed. There was substantial evidence, albeit contradicted, to support the finding and so much of the determination holding that petitioner improperly moved a train against the direction of traffic without permission.

Concur: Judges Breitel, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Chief Judge Fuld and Judge Burke dissent and vote to affirm on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 N.E.2d 735, 32 N.Y.2d 948, 347 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/page-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-ny-1973.