Page v. Lewis
39 S.E.2d 787, 209 S.C. 212, 1946 S.C. LEXIS 20
Opinions
delivered the majority opinion of the Court.
We have made a diligent study of the record in this case, and it is our opinion that no other conclusion can be reasonably reached on the factual situation than that arrived at by the Honorable L. D. Lide, Circuit Judge, whose able decree is hereby adopted by a majority of the Court as its opinion, and will be reported.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Page v. Lewis, 39 S.E.2d 787, 209 S.C. 212, 1946 S.C. LEXIS 20 (S.C. 1946).
39 S.E.2d 787 (Page v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Macaulay v. Wachovia Bank of South Carolina, N.A.
569 S.E.2d 371 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2002)
MacAulay v. WACHOVIA BANK OF SC, NA
569 S.E.2d 371 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2002)
Middleton Ex Rel. Estate of Burkett v. Suber
388 S.E.2d 639 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1990)
Bullard v. Crawley
363 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1987)
Hemingway v. Small
324 S.E.2d 335 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Baptist Foundation for Christian Education v. Baptist College
317 S.E.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Atkinson v. Belser
255 S.E.2d 852 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1979)
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. DeLoache
297 F. Supp. 647 (D. South Carolina, 1969)
Stylecraft, Inc. v. Thomas
159 S.E.2d 46 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1968)
Avant v. JOHNSON
97 S.E.2d 396 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1957)
Owens v. Sweat
86 S.E.2d 886 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
Brock v. Brock
61 S.E.2d 885 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)
Scott v. SCOTT
57 S.E.2d 470 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)
Lyon v. Bargiol
47 S.E.2d 625 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)