Page and Wirtz Construction Company, Cross-Appellants v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers Ofamerica, Local Union 408, Cross-Appellees. No. 71-1397 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

444 F.2d 253
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 21, 1971
Docket253_1
StatusPublished

This text of 444 F.2d 253 (Page and Wirtz Construction Company, Cross-Appellants v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers Ofamerica, Local Union 408, Cross-Appellees. No. 71-1397 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Page and Wirtz Construction Company, Cross-Appellants v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers Ofamerica, Local Union 408, Cross-Appellees. No. 71-1397 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 444 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

444 F.2d 253

77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3005, 65 Lab.Cas. P 11,912

PAGE AND WIRTZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,
v.
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL AND
ORNAMENTAL IRONWORKERS OFAMERICA, LOCAL UNION 408,
et al., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.
No. 71-1397 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431
F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 1971.

Tom Upchurch, Jr., Buddy Wright, Forth Worth, Tex., for appellants.

John Cosmic, C.J. Taylor, Jr., Amarillo, Tex., for appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Halbert O. Woodward, District Judge.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue in a trial to the Court below was the amount of damages, if any, due the appellees and cross appellants under 29 U.S.C. 187(b) as the consequence of a secondary boycott (see our decision as to the boycott, International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers of America, Local Union 408, AFL-CIO v. N.L.R.B., No. 29,944, September 1, 1970).

After hearing the evidence the District Court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, fixing and awarding damages in some instances and denying recovery in others. The findings are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The judgment will be affirmed on both direct and cross appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 F.2d 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/page-and-wirtz-construction-company-cross-appellants-v-international-ca5-1971.