Pagano v. Pagano
This text of 222 A.D. 850 (Pagano v. Pagano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment directed for defendant dismissing the complaint, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the finding of the adultery of the defendant. (Nottingham v. Nottingham, No. 1, 209 App. Div. 459; Pollock v. Pollock, 71 N. Y. 137.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbróuck, JJ., concur. The court disapproves of findings of fact numbered 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D. 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pagano-v-pagano-nyappdiv-1928.