Pagano v. Boston, Albany, Rochester, Buffalo Express, Inc.

260 A.D. 960, 23 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5619

This text of 260 A.D. 960 (Pagano v. Boston, Albany, Rochester, Buffalo Express, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pagano v. Boston, Albany, Rochester, Buffalo Express, Inc., 260 A.D. 960, 23 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiffs (two passengers) from a judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict of no cause of action. The infant plaintiffs and four other persons were riding in an automobile traveling in a westerly direction on Route 5 near Oneida. The automobile collided with a truck owned by the corporate defendant and driven [961]*961by the defendant Lineberry. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents; Hill, P. J., and Foster, J., concur upon the grounds that while the preponderance of evidence in favor of the plaintiff sappeUants is not too impressive, four other occupants of the automobile have recovered verdicts on a previous trial; Bliss and Heffeman, JJ., concur on the ground that the verdicts are against the weight of the evidence; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to affirm upon the grounds that no criticism of the trial or charge was made, and the judge presiding at the trial refused to set aside the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 960, 23 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pagano-v-boston-albany-rochester-buffalo-express-inc-nyappdiv-1940.