Pagano v. Boston, Albany, Rochester, Buffalo Express, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pagano v. Boston, Albany, Rochester, Buffalo Express, Inc.

260 A.D. 960, 23 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5619

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1940·Published

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiffs (two passengers) from a judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict of no cause of action. The infant plaintiffs and four other persons were riding in an automobile traveling in a westerly direction on Route 5 near Oneida. The automobile collided with a truck owned by the corporate defendant and driven [961]*961by the defendant Lineberry. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents; Hill, P. J., and Foster, J., concur upon the grounds that while the preponderance of evidence in favor of the plaintiff sappeUants is not too impressive, four other occupants of the automobile have recovered verdicts on a previous trial; Bliss and Heffeman, JJ., concur on the ground that the verdicts are against the weight of the evidence; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to affirm upon the grounds that no criticism of the trial or charge was made, and the judge presiding at the trial refused to set aside the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiffs (two passengers) from a judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict of no cause of action. The infant plaintiffs and four other persons were riding in an automobile traveling in a westerly direction on Route 5 near Oneida. The automobile collided with a truck owned by the corporate defendant and driven [961]*961by the defendant Lineberry. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman and Foster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents; Hill, P. J., and Foster, J., concur upon the grounds that while the preponderance of evidence in favor of the plaintiff sappeUants is not too impressive, four other occupants of the automobile have recovered verdicts on a previous trial; Bliss and Heffeman, JJ., concur on the ground that the verdicts are against the weight of the evidence; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to affirm upon the grounds that no criticism of the trial or charge was made, and the judge presiding at the trial refused to set aside the verdict.

Pagano v. Boston, Albany, Rochester, Buffalo Express, Inc., 260 A.D. 960, 23 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

260 A.D. 960 (Pagano v. Boston, Albany, Rochester, Buffalo Express, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.