Pagan v. Kaskel

548 So. 2d 842, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2134, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4974, 1989 WL 104042
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1989·No. No. 88-1762·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of the trial court order dismissing appellant’s second amended complaint against defendant Matthew Kaskel in a wrongful death action. The complaint alleged that Kaskel was a fellow employee of the decedent and that negligent actions or omissions of Kaskel caused the demise of decedent, who was fatally injured during the course of his employment. The trial court dismissed the second amended complaint with leave to amend, but the plaintiff elected to stand on the complaint as written. We entirely agree with the trial judge that the second amended complaint does not allege facts sufficient to show gross negligence within the meaning of section 440.11(1), Florida Statutes (1985) as construed in Streeter v. Sullivan, 509 So.2d 268 (Fla.1987).1

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pagan v. Kaskel, 548 So. 2d 842, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2134, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4974, 1989 WL 104042 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

548 So. 2d 842 (Pagan v. Kaskel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blue Supply Corp. v. Novos Electro Mechanical, Inc.
990 So. 2d 1157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Blue Supply Corp. v. Novos Electro Mech., Inc.
990 So. 2d 1157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)