Pafford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pafford v. State

433 So. 2d 40, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20215

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 17, 1983

DocketNos. AN-385, AN-386

StatusPublished

This text of 433 So. 2d 40 (Pafford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pafford v. State, 433 So. 2d 40, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20215 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

JOANOS, Judge.

We disagree with appellant’s argument that the verdict rendered in this case was not responsive to the charge and insufficient to support a conviction, and in any event, the issue was not sufficiently raised before the trial court. See Lake v. State, 380 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), and McClanahan v. State, 377 So.2d 240 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

As to appellant’s second argument, however, we agree that there is error in the adjudication, in that the judgment form reflects a crime other than the crime of which the jury found appellant guilty, possession of cannabis in' excess of twenty grams. Since this is an error in the adjudication, rather than a sentencing error, we remand for entry of a correct adjudication for possession of cannabis in excess of twenty grams.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a correct adjudication.

LARRY G. SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI