Pafford v. Biomet

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pafford v. Biomet

451 S.E.2d 128, 215 Ga. App. 184, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 1186

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 10, 1994

DocketA93A1245

StatusPublished

This text of 451 S.E.2d 128 (Pafford v. Biomet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pafford v. Biomet, 451 S.E.2d 128, 215 Ga. App. 184, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 1186 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

In Pafford v. Biomet, 210 Ga. App. 486 (436 SE2d 504), we affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgments to defendants Biomet and Pfizer. The Supreme Court, on certiorari, reversed our affirmance of the grant of summary judgment to Biomet and affirmed our affirmance of the grant of summary judgment to Pfizer. Pafford v. Biomet, 264 Ga. 540 (448 SE2d 347). Remittitur having been received in this court on October 27, 1994, the grant of summary judgment to Biomet is hereby reversed and the grant of summary judgment to Pfizer is hereby affirmed. The trial court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

[185]*185Decided November 10, 1994. Sutton & Associates, Berrien L. Sutton, for appellant. Love & Willingham, John A. Gilleland, Michael J. Hannan III, Sullivan, Hall, Booth & Smith, John E. Hall, Jr., T. Andrew Graham, for appellees.

Judgments affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Pope, C. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

In Pafford v. Biomet, 210 Ga. App. 486 (436 SE2d 504), we affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgments to defendants Biomet and Pfizer. The Supreme Court, on certiorari, reversed our affirmance of the grant of summary judgment to Biomet and affirmed our affirmance of the grant of summary judgment to Pfizer. Pafford v. Biomet, 264 Ga. 540 (448 SE2d 347). Remittitur having been received in this court on October 27, 1994, the grant of summary judgment to Biomet is hereby reversed and the grant of summary judgment to Pfizer is hereby affirmed. The trial court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

[185]*185Decided November 10, 1994. Sutton & Associates, Berrien L. Sutton, for appellant. Love & Willingham, John A. Gilleland, Michael J. Hannan III, Sullivan, Hall, Booth & Smith, John E. Hall, Jr., T. Andrew Graham, for appellees.

Judgments affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Pope, C. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

451 S.E.2d 128, 215 Ga. App. 184, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 1186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pafford-v-biomet-gactapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack