Pafford v. Biomet

451 S.E.2d 128, 215 Ga. App. 184, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 1186
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pafford v. Biomet. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 Ga. App. 486
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 10, 1994·No. A93A1245·Published

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

In Pafford v. Biomet, 210 Ga. App. 486 (436 SE2d 504), we affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgments to defendants Biomet and Pfizer. The Supreme Court, on certiorari, reversed our affirmance of the grant of summary judgment to Biomet and affirmed our affirmance of the grant of summary judgment to Pfizer. Pafford v. Biomet, 264 Ga. 540 (448 SE2d 347). Remittitur having been received in this court on October 27, 1994, the grant of summary judgment to Biomet is hereby reversed and the grant of summary judgment to Pfizer is hereby affirmed. The trial court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

[185] Decided November 10, 1994. Sutton & Associates, Berrien L. Sutton, for appellant. Love & Willingham, John A. Gilleland, Michael J. Hannan III, Sullivan, Hall, Booth & Smith, John E. Hall, Jr., T. Andrew Graham, for appellees.

Judgments affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Pope, C. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pafford v. Biomet, 451 S.E.2d 128, 215 Ga. App. 184, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 1186 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

451 S.E.2d 128 (Pafford v. Biomet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pafford v. Biomet
436 S.E.2d 504 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Pafford v. Biomet
448 S.E.2d 347 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)