Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Paffen v. City of New York

Paffen v. City of New York

173 A.D. 953
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paffen v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 A.D. 423 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

—Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presented a. question for the jury as to how decedent fell into the drain, and also we think that the objection to the question to the physician at folios 246 and 247 should not have been sustained. Thomas, Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paffen v. City of New York, 173 A.D. 953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

173 A.D. 953 (Paffen v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.